Struggling with Jitsi setup, scalling, or customization?
Meet Avkash for expert
solutions to streamline your Jitsi experience efficiently.
Trusted Clients
Jitsi Support We have 10+ jitsi developer and helped 200+ Client for
installation, rebranding, scaling and custom development 
In the realm of video conferencing, Jitsi and Janus emerge as contenders, each with its own set of attributes. Let’s unravel the distinctions between these platforms to help you decide which aligns better with your communication needs.
Jitsi, renowned for its user-friendly interface, caters to both individuals and small to medium-sized businesses. As an open-source solution, Jitsi offers accessibility without the burden of hefty costs. With features like easy integration and straightforward Jitsi setup, Jitsi stands out as a reliable choice for those seeking a hassle-free video conferencing experience.
Janus, on the other hand, positions itself as a versatile and extensible platform, specializing in real-time communication applications. As an open-source solution, Janus excels in flexibility, allowing developers to tailor the platform to their specific needs. While it may require a bit more technical expertise, Janus is a powerful option for those prioritizing customization and scalability.
Ease of Use
Scalability
Customization
| Feature | Jitsi | Janus |
|---|---|---|
| Type | All-in-one video conferencing platform | WebRTC gateway and server |
| Ease of use | Very easy | Moderate (requires programming knowledge) |
| Scalability | High | Very high |
| Security | Good (end-to-end encryption) | Excellent (granular control) |
| Features | Basic (jitsi recording, screen sharing, chat) | Advanced (recording, streaming, transcoding, custom protocols) |
| Cost | Free (open-source) | Free (open-source) |
| Customization | Limited | High |
| Developer friendly? | Beginner-friendly | Experienced developers |
| Target audience | General users, businesses | Developers, complex applications |
| Deployment | Self-hosted or cloud-based | Self-hosted |
| Integrations | Pre-built SDKs for various platforms | Requires custom integration |
| Learning curve | Low | High |
For Easy Adoption and Everyday Use Recommendation: Jitsi’s user-friendly approach and accessibility make it an excellent choice for individuals and small businesses.
For Developers and Customization Enthusiasts Recommendation: Janus, with its flexibility and extensibility, is a preferred option for those looking to customize and adapt the platform to specific real-time communication needs.
While Jitsi is user-friendly and cost-effective, Janus may be more suitable for large businesses with complex communication requirements.
Janus is more developer-centric, requiring technical expertise for optimal use. It may not be as user-friendly for non-developers as Jitsi.
Yes, Jitsi supports third-party integrations, making it versatile for various use cases.
Yes, Janus is an open-source platform and is free to use, allowing for extensive customization and adaptation to specific needs.
We have worked on 200+ jitsi projects and we are expert now.
